As a mom, you’re constantly being pulled in a million directions—and now, it seems like even sunscreen is controversial. One scroll on social media, and you’ll see influencers calling it “toxic,” “hormone-disrupting,” or worse
But what’s the truth? Is sunscreen toxic? Or is not using sunscreen the bigger risk? It’s overwhelming. And honestly? It makes me feel like it’s easier to skip the sunscreen altogether.
Yes—even some “non-toxic” influencers aren’t telling the full truth. And don’t even get me started on the big brands. They highlight the good stuff and hide the rest. Most of the time, we don’t even know what we’re putting on our kids’ skin.
So, let’s break it down together—without fear and with your family’s real health in mind.

This blog post delves into the question, “Is sunscreen toxic?”
Why Sunscreen Matters for Your Family’s Health
Let’s start with the basics.
What Does UV Radiation Actually Do?
- UVA rays (think A = aging) go deep into the skin and can cause premature wrinkles and long-term DNA damage.
- UVB rays (think B = burning) affect the top layer and are the main cause of sunburns.
- Both types increase the risk of skin cancer, including melanoma.
And yes, even short bursts of sun exposure over time add up, especially for babies and children who have thinner, more sensitive skin.
How do Sunscreens Work?
The active ingredients in sunscreen work by absorbing, reflecting, or scattering UV radiation to protect your skin.
The active ingredients in sunscreens protect your skin by absorbing, reflecting, or scattering UV radiation. The difference between physical and chemical sunscreen comes down to what they are made of and how they protect you from the sun’s rays.
Chemical (organic) sunscreens do this using carbon-based molecules with special structures that let their electrons absorb UV and release the energy.
Physical (mineral, inorganic) sunscreens, such as zinc oxide and titanium dioxide, utilize a different structure called a “band gap” to achieve a similar effect.
The ability of a sunscreen to absorb UVA or UVB depends on how its molecules are built—especially their rings and bond patterns—and the formula, pH, and other ingredients can also affect how well it works.
Do Chemical and Physical Sunscreens Work Differently?
People often say that physical or inorganic sunscreens (like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide) reflect UV rays off your skin, while chemical or organic sunscreens (like avobenzone) absorb UV rays and turn them into heat. But the truth is—they actually work in very similar ways for most of the UV light spectrum.
How do Chemical Sunscreens Work (AKA Organic Sunscreens)
Chemical sunscreens have special carbon-based molecules. These molecules are arranged with a pattern of single and double bonds (called conjugated bonds) that are great at soaking up UV light.
When UV light hits these molecules:
- The energy pushes electrons into a more excited state.
- Then, the molecules release that energy by wiggling or vibrating, which turns the UV energy into heat.
Sometimes, certain ingredients like avobenzone can’t release the energy well. Instead, they change shape after absorbing UV light, and the new shape doesn’t protect as well. These new shapes can also be irritating to your skin.
That’s why many formulas include photostabilizers, which help keep ingredients like avobenzone stable by safely handling the extra energy before it causes problems.
How do Physical Sunscreens Work (AKA Mineral or Inorganic Sunscreens)
Inorganic sunscreens like zinc oxide and titanium dioxide are made from tiny mineral particles. Even though their structure is different from chemical sunscreens, they protect your skin in a very similar way:
- They absorb UV rays and turn that energy into heat, just like chemical sunscreens.
- The size of the particles affects which wavelengths of UV light they absorb best.
Many people still believe mineral sunscreens work mainly by reflecting or scattering UV light, but that’s an outdated myth.
Here’s why this myth exists:
Years ago, the cosmetics industry thought mineral sunscreens worked only by scattering UV rays. This was even written into the FDA’s 1978 sunscreen guidelines.

But by 1999, the FDA removed that statement after scientific research proved otherwise. Still, the myth stuck around.

In reality, scientists have long known that physical or inorganic sunscreens both absorb and scatter UV light (only about 5-10%), but mostly absorb it. Peer-reviewed studies continue to point this out, yet the misconception persists.
So while their ingredients and structure differ, physical or inorganic sunscreens protect primarily through absorption, just like chemical or organic sunscreens.
What is the difference between zinc oxide and titanium dioxide sunscreens?
Zinc oxide absorbs both UVB (burning rays) and UVA (aging rays), making it a great broad-spectrum sunscreen. Titanium dioxide mainly absorbs UVB and tends to scatter UVA, especially longer UVA rays.
So, Are Sunscreens Toxic?
To try to answer this question (without being biased by so much misinformation), we must examine the active ingredients used in chemical or organic sunscreens in detail. For this section, I will utilize the FDA, EU, EWG, and articles from fellow scientists.
What Sunscreen Active Ingredients are Considered Safe and Effective by the FDA?
Sunscreens in the US are regulated as over-the-counter (OTC) drugs. (More about how they are regulated later!)
In 2020, the FDA updated how it regulates over-the-counter (OTC) drugs like sunscreen through a law called the CARES Act. This law replaced the old, slow rule-making system with a faster and more modern system called the administrative order process.
Because of this, the FDA created a “deemed final order” for sunscreen — basically using older rules from 1999 (with updated testing and labeling from 2011) to set the current standard. Most sunscreens you see today follow this.
The FDA also released a “proposed order” to update these rules based on newer science. It’s not official yet — they’re gathering feedback and will finalize it later, but it’s mostly the same as what they proposed back in 2019.
Based on the current research, zinc oxide and titanium dioxide (both used in physical AKA mineral AKA inorganic sunscreens) are considered safe and effective for use in sunscreens at levels up to 25%.
What Sunscreen Active Ingredients are Considered Toxic?
After reviewing the data, the FDA found that PABA (aminobenzoic acid) and trolamine salicylate carry more risks than benefits when used in sunscreens.
- Trolamine salicylate may cause serious health problems, like bleeding and salicylate poisoning, because of how it affects blood clotting.
- PABA has been linked to high rates of allergic skin reactions and may cause people to react to similar chemicals as well.
Because of these safety concerns, the FDA is proposing that these two ingredients should no longer be considered safe and effective for use in sunscreens.
Are Chemical Sunscreens Toxic?
Right now, there isn’t enough data to confirm that the active ingredients currently approved for use in chemical sunscreens are safe and effective (GRASE): cinoxate, dioxybenzone, ensulizole, homosalate, meradimate, octinoxate, octisalate, octocrylene, padimate O, sulisobenzone, oxybenzone, and avobenzone.
For example, recent studies show that oxybenzone is absorbed through the skin more than we thought. It has been found in breast milk, urine, blood, and even amniotic fluid.
That level of absorption raises concerns, especially since there’s not enough research to fully understand how it behaves in the body. Some studies also suggest it may affect hormone activity, but more data is needed.
Most of the other ingredients on this list also lack sufficient information on their absorption into the body, which is why the FDA proposes that they should not be considered safe and effective at this time.
To be clear, the FDA is not saying that these sunscreen ingredients are unsafe. We just need more up-to-date information to decide if they are still considered safe and effective.
This is because sunscreen use has gone up a lot since these ingredients were first reviewed, and we now have new data and concerns to consider.
Are Nanoparticles in Mineral Sunscreen Toxic?
To make mineral sunscreens smoother and less chalky, many companies use very tiny particles—called nanoparticles—which are measured in billionths of a meter. These nano-sized minerals help reduce white cast and boost SPF.
This is where the science is still evolving. Some studies show that zinc oxide and titanium dioxide nanoparticles don’t absorb through healthy skin in large amounts:
- One real-world study found that after volunteers applied sunscreen twice a day for five days, less than 0.01% of zinc entered the bloodstream.
- Other research from the FDA and European scientists found that these particles mostly stay on the skin’s surface.
- A 2018 study concluded that nano-sized titanium dioxide does not go beyond the top layer of skin.
- A study by Italian researchers looked at damaged skin and found no evidence that nanoparticles could pass through it.
What About Breathing or Swallowing Them?
The bigger concern is inhaling or swallowing nanoparticles, for example, from spray or powder sunscreens:
- Tiny particles can be hard for the lungs to clear and might enter the bloodstream.
- Swallowing nanoparticles may irritate or harm the digestive system.
- However, there’s little evidence that people absorb enough from sunscreen use to cause harm.
Because of this, the FDA is calling for more safety testing of powder and aerosol sunscreens to make sure people aren’t inhaling harmful levels of particles.
Are Aerosol Sunscreens Toxic?
Some spray sunscreens have been found to contain benzene, a cancer-causing chemical. There is no safe level of benzene exposure.
It may get into sunscreens through spray propellants or other petroleum-based ingredients. The biggest concern? You can breathe it in and absorb it through your skin.
Bottom line: Avoid aerosol sunscreens when possible.
FDA Sunscreen Ingredient Guide (2021 Proposed Order)
| Active Ingredient | FDA GRASE Status | EWG Score | Concern |
| Aminobenzoic Acid (PABA) | ❌ Not GRASE – Unsafe | Moderate Hazard, 6 | Once-common sunscreen ingredient, now avoided due to allergic dermatitis and photosensitivity. Research indicates PABA has carcinogenic potential. |
| Trolamine Salicylate (a salt of triethanolamine and salicylic acid, i.e. the compound consists of protonated triethanolamine and the conjugate base of salicylic acid, salicate) | ❌ Not GRASE – Unsafe | Triethanolamine, Moderate Hazard, 6Salicylic Acid, Moderate Hazard, 3-6 | Potential for serious detrimental health effects (including bleeding) caused by the anticoagulation effects of salicylic acid and increased risk of salicylate toxicity. |
| Octinoxate | ⚠️ More data needed | High Hazard, 7 | Estrogenic effects are noted in laboratory animals as well as disruption of thyroid hormone and brain signaling. |
| Homosalate | ⚠️ More data needed | Moderate Hazard, 3-5 | A weak hormone disruptor, forms toxic metabolites, and can enhance the penetration of a toxic herbicide. |
| Octisalate | ⚠️ More data needed | Moderate Hazard, 1-5 | May increase skin penetration of other ingredients. |
| Oxybenzone | ⚠️ More data needed | Moderate Hazard, 4 | Absorbs through the skin in significant amounts. It contaminates the bodies of 97% of Americans according to Centers for Disease Control research. |
| Dioxybenzone (derivative of Benzophenone) | ⚠️ More data needed | Drug Bank | Potential allergen; limited modern safety data |
| Padimate O | ⚠️ More data needed | Moderate Hazard, 1-4 | Releases free radicals, damages DNA, has estrogenic activity, and causes allergic reactions in some people. |
| Meradimate AKA Menthyl anthranilate | ⚠️ More data needed | Moderate Hazard, 3 | Not permitted for use in Europe or Japan. 1 study found that it produces damaging reactive oxygen species when exposed to sunlight. |
| Sulisobenzone | ⚠️ More data needed | Moderate Hazard, 3 | Can cause skin and eye irritation; does not penetrate the skin to a large degree, but enhances the ability of other chemicals to penetrate. |
| Ensulizole | ⚠️ More data needed | Moderate Hazard, 2-3 | Known to produce free radicals when exposed to sunlight, leading to damage of DNA, may have the potential to cause cancer. |
| Octocrylene | ⚠️ More data needed | Low Hazard, 1-2 | Produces oxygen radicals when exposed to UV light. |
| Avobenzone | ⚠️ More data needed | Low Hazard, 1-2 | Sunlight causes this unstable ingredient to break down into unknown chemicals, especially in the presence of another active, Octinoxate. |
| Cinoxate AKA Ethyl Methoxycinnamate | ⚠️ More data needed | Low Hazard, 1 | Rarely used; lacks recent safety research |
| Zinc Oxide (non-nano) | ✅ GRASE | Low Hazard, 1-2 | Physical UV blocker; not absorbed into skin |
| Titanium Dioxide (non-nano) | ✅ GRASE | Low Hazard, 1 | Physical UV blocker; low skin absorption; stable; inhalation concerns |
✅ GRASE = Generally Recognized As Safe and Effective
⚠️ More Data Needed = FDA needs more safety info before confirming
❌ Not GRASE – Unsafe = Proven to pose safety risks

Bottom Line: What You Should Know (No Fear)
- Don’t skip protection out of fear of chemicals.
- Physical AKA Mineral AKA Inorganic sunscreens are a great choice, especially for kids.
- Chemical AKA Organic sunscreens are still regulated and far better than exposure to UV rays.
- Don’t forget the basics. Hats, long sleeves, and shade are always a smart choice.
- The choice of sunscreen should be based on:
- Skin sensitivity—chemical filters may irritate some people.
- Exposure concerns—some chemical filters are absorbed into the body, but at very low levels; long-term effects are still under study.
- Ingredients transparency—many mineral brands hide the fact that they’re only using tiny amounts of the active zinc oxide.
- FDA regulates sunscreens tightly, but its update process is slow; the EU allows more filters and stricter labeling.
Don’t let fear stop you from protecting your child.
If a physical sunscreen works for your family, great.
If a chemical one is all you have on a hot day at the zoo, it’s still great.
You’re doing your best, and your kids need protection more than perfection.
Final Thoughts: Sunscreen Isn’t the Enemy—Sunburn Is
This post isn’t sponsored. I’m not here to push one type of sunscreen over another. My goal is to help you cut through the confusion so you can make confident, informed decisions for your family.
Because at the end of the day, sunscreen shouldn’t be scary—it should be simple.
Sources:


